Peer Review Process

All submissions are considered by the Manager in the first instance. Suitable papers are peer-reviewed by a minimum of two experts. Peer-reviewers are selected for their knowledge and expertise and may include, but are not limited to Editorial Advisory Board by The Editor. Submissions are assessed on the Latest theories of Law with focus on development.

Authors are strongly advised to read the instructions below before submitting a manuscript. Submitted manuscripts that do not adhere to  standards may be returned to the author(s). Resubmissions of papers previously declined may be considered when invited by the editor.

Reviewers of Society, Development and Commercial law Review must confirm the following:

  • That all manuscripts are reviewed in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of author(s).
  •  That any observed conflict of interest during the review process must be communicated to the Editor-in-Chief.
  • That all information pertaining to the manuscript is kept confidential.
  • That any information that may be the reason for the rejection of publication of a manuscript must be communicated to the Editor-in-Chief.

Editors of Comparative Law Review must confirm the following:

  • That all manuscripts are evaluated in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of authors.
  • That information pertaining manuscripts are kept confidential.
  •  That any observed conflict of interest pertaining manuscripts must be disclosed.
  •  The Editorial Board takes responsibility for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts based on the reviewer’s evaluation of the manuscript, policies of the journal editorial board and legal restrain acting against plagiarism, libel and copyright infringement